Papers with text quality evaluation

2 papers
Improving Preference Extraction In LLMs By Identifying Latent Knowledge Through Classifying Probes (2025.acl-long)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large Language Models (LLMs) are often used as automated judges to evaluate text, but their effectiveness can be hindered by unintentional biases.
Approach: They propose to use linear classifying probes to access LLMs’ latent knowledge and extract more accurate preferences by leveraging differences between contrasting pairs of prompts.
Outcome: The proposed method outperforms generation-based judgements while maintaining similar computational costs.
Evaluating LLMs’ Assessment of Mixed-Context Hallucination Through the Lens of Summarization (2025.findings-acl)

Copied to clipboard

Challenge: Large language models generate coherent text and follow instructions across diverse tasks, but a critical challenge in scaling LLM applications is hallucination, where the generated content lacks factual grounding or deviates from the intended discourse context.
Approach: They use summarization as a representative task to evaluate LLMs' capability in detecting mixed-context hallucinations, specifically distinguishing between factual and non-factual hallucinos.
Outcome: The proposed model distinguishes between factual and non-factual hallucinations, and their performance bottlenecks.

What is GenGO?

GenGO is an NLP powered publication search system. It currenctly indexes 30k+ papers from ACL Anthology, and implements multi-aspect summarization, semantic search, and more!

Information

About
Limitations